Kristof (1996) defined P-O fit
as ‘the compatibility between people and organizations that occurs when (a) at
least one entity provides what the other needs, or (b) they share similar
fundamental characteristics or (c) both’. Taking this approach recognizes the
distinction between supplementary and complementary fit. Supplementary fit
occurs when a person has similar characteristics to other individuals, and
complementary fit occurs when the individual and the situation meet each
other’s needs.
In employee selection research,
P-O fit can be conceptualized as the match between an applicant and broader
organizational attribute (Judge & Ferris, 1992; Rynes & Gerhart, 1990).
Researchers and practitioners contend that P-O fit is the key to maintaining
the flexible and committed workforce that is necessary in a competitive
business environment and a tight labor market (Bowen, Ledford & Nathan,
1991; Kristof, 1996).
The application of P-O fit to recruitment and
selection has emerged from Schneider’s (1987) attraction-selection-attrition
(ASA) model. He proposed that attraction to, selection into, and remaining in
an organization are all determined by the perceived similarity between the
person and her/his work environment (i.e. P-O fit). Specifically, individuals
estimate the match between their personality, attitudes and values and the
organization’s values, goals, structures, processes, and culture (Schneider,
Goldstein, & Smith, 1995).
No comments:
Post a Comment